Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Wildlife panel seizes 70 birds


New Delhi 24 June:Illegal trade of protected birds continue unabated in the city with the Wildlife Crime Control Bureau (WCCB) officials seizing 70 live birds including parrots and munias meant for sale.Alexandrian parrots and black headed munias were seized from a locked room of a rented house in Daryaganj area in central Delhi, WCCB official Ramesh Pandey said.However, no arrest has been made in this connection."On the basis of an information, a raid was conducted by a WCCB team with assistance from local police. The team led by WCCB inspector Aarti Singh found the room, where the birds were kept, locked and the owners had no clue about the tenants to whom they had rented out the rooms," Pandey said.During investigation, it was found that two minor boys living nearby were employed by the accused to feed the birds.
- (Agencies)
Jun 24, 2009

Illegal pet trade thrives

23 Jun 2009, 1317 hrs IST, PTI (Archana Jyoti)
NEW DELHI: They may not abound in numbers but exist they do in many cities, doing good business with local as well as foreign clientele, most of it illegally. Waking up to this menace of pet shops operating illegally, Wildlife Crime Control Bureau (WCCB) has now asked the state governments to chalk out a policy to register dealers engaged in pet trade, selling domestic birds and animals across the country. "We have asked the chief wildlife wardens of all the states and civic agencies to regulate the dealers involved in the business of selling domestic animals and birds," says Ramesh Pandey, a senior official with WCCB. He knows better. Just a few months ago, the Bureau had unearthed an illegal pet trade racket and seized four live Indian Tent turtles from Gurgaon and arrested a person in this connection. The accused, Rittin Mehrotra, a resident of Dhankot in Gurgaon, was allegedly running his pet business for many years. The WCCB officials came to know that some of his pets allegedly included exotic and endangered species which are protected under Indian law. Indian Tent turtle are listed in the schedule one of the Wildlife Protection Act 1972. Being small and having very beautiful shells, they are traded as pets in the country as well as in the international market. Besides, turtles, the enforcement official said much of the pet trade is dominated by reptiles and exotic birds and an increasing trend exists to meet the demand of specialist collectors for some of the world's rarest species. In the garb of selling muniyas which are allowed for trade under law, the dealers are making the protected species such as Straw-headed Bulbul Pycnonotus zeylanicus, Palm Cockatoo Probosciger atterrimus, tortoises and freshwater turtles (Indian Star Tortoise Geochelone elegans, and the Pignosed Turtle Carretochelys insculpta), snakes or lizards, available to customers at exorbitant prices. The global demand is huge and hence trade is flourishing, threatening the renowned biodiversity hotspots in South-east Asia - as well as rising demand from countries within South-east Asia for endemic species from Africa, South America and Australasia. A report by Traffic International, the wildlife trade monitoring network, dwells in detail how freshwater turtles and tortoises in Southeast Asia is fuelling rampant illegal trade in the pet markets of Indonesia. Terming the trend as a serious threat to the wildlife, Sameer Sinha from Traffic India said, "The pet trade is mostly in unorganised sector with no guidelines and regulations. Since wildlife trade is not allowed under Wildlife Protection Act, the civic agencies can register the pet dealers under Shops and Eastablishment Act to ensure a comprehensive policy. WCCB move is welcome in this direction." All the enforcement agencies should have the list of such dealers so that their activities are under scanner and can also also act as a deterrent, he added. Ashok Kumar, Vice-Chairman of Wildlife Trust of India added, "in the garb of pet trade, several threatened and endemic species are being smuggled outside and in the country. Various districts of Uttar Pradesh have become the hub of dealers engaged in sale and purchase of birds and turtles while authorities such as railways and police are just sleeping over the matter, Kumar added. "It's time we understood and recognised that all wildlife are protected species and buying them and keeping them without permission is illegal. Anybody who spots a turtle in a shop must immediately report this. Thousands of Starred Tortoises are smuggled out of India to be kept as pets. Their shells are also used to make ashtrays and trays," Kartick Satyanarayan, member, advisory board, Wildlife Crime Control Bureau, said.

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

E-Legal Trade In Endangered Species


In the virtual bazar beyond the pale of law, PRERNA SINGH BINDRA traps the illegal traders of wildlife
IT’S SIMPLE, buying peacocks on India’s newest market place for the booming illegal trade in wildlife — cyberspace. It took me just half-a-day; some browsing on the Internet and one phone call to be offered India’s national bird. Adults, and chicks, as many as required. This was through a classified ad website, www.adpost.com, which, among its vast menu, lists ads offering birds for sale, mainly ‘legal’ exotic birds. But that’s only for the public eye, a cover. The real deals are made over through private email and chatrooms. I picked on just one such dealer, Kanpur-based, who had advertised on the site. Within a few hours I — as a potential client — had in my inbox pictures of the birds “I can go ahead and provide”, including Alexandrian and plum-headed parakeets, the trade of which is banned under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. Plus a pair of peacock chicks, and a mature male, protected as a Schedule I species, which means they have the same legal cover as the tiger. For all that it matters — available, as they are, at the click of a mouse, from the many dealers trawling their wild ware over the Internet. Another one up for grabs is the star tortoise, also a protected and endemic species, with traders from Chennai “willing to have bulk order of Indian star tortoise”, at $500 per piece on a UK-based website, to those offering a “four Indian star tortoise for sale for good price. Plz write back,” in chatrooms.
The scale of the crime is much wider as a seizure in Meerut on August 26 proved. This is the first conclusive evidence of cyberrun wildlife trade in India that materialised out of months of online tracking by a Delhi-based NGO, the Wildlife Trust of India (WTI). The introduction with the dealer, Jeevan Thakur, was first made through an Orkut chat room. While talk was on for various rare and endemic species, the final deal was struck — through a false email id, fangsofmumba@yahoo.com, to be precise — for peacocks and hill mynas, both falling under Schedule I of the WPA. There was another prize catch — an albino civet cat — also protected by law. Civets are relatively common. This one, being an albino, was rare — if only for the purposes of the market, and the deal, after much bargaining, was arrived at Rs 2.35 lakh. Apparently Thakur had a customer from Dubai who offered Rs 5 lakh, but he preferred to sell in India.
The extent of Thakur’s trade was revealed when his cyber history was investigated — he used online social networks and ads to meet with potential customers, spread across India, the Middle East, Far Eastern countries and Europe. Other destinations where he smuggled wildlife are still being investigated. His booty of illegal menagerie included rare mammals like the slender loris, giant squirrels (primarily for the pet trade) and spiny-tailed lizards (its oil is used for aphrodisiacs). Birds were Thakur’s forte — Shaheen and peregrine falcons, golden orioles, peacocks, parakeets, sunbirds, barbets — you name it, Thakur made it available. Owls have a good market, especially the great horned owl, which fetches a huge price. One trader had even specified the weight he wanted; “1. 5 lakhs for a 3.5 kilos owl (live) for voodoo purpose.” According to Ashok Kumar, vice chairman, WTI, Thakur, and his brother Akash, also an accused in the Meerut case, have been in the business for at least a decade. Emails dating to 2003 reveal that Akash offered a decoy customer, besides endangered birds, python, and the critically endangered female clouded leopard.
“It may sound horrific, but the known cases represent little more than the proverbial tip of the iceberg — so tremendous is the scope of the web, and so little do we know about it, especially in India. There has been no study or survey, unlike in the US, and Europe — which reveals that everything is available on the Internet. Though impossible to quantify, there is no denying that the illegal wildlife trade on the Internet is alive, and growing by the minute,” says BK Sharma, who was formerly attached to the Wildlife Crime unit of the CBI.
While little is known of the extent of the wild web trade in the country, there is intelligence information mainly from overseas official agencies that ivory from South India, and shahtoosh shawls from Kashmir and Delhi are being peddled on the Internet.
This is also an indicator of the change in the profile of the trader — a new generation of tech-savvy peddlers is overtaking the traditional trader who conducted his shady business in the bylanes of old towns or in stuffy backrooms of bird markets in various towns. The market has changed from a ‘physical’ entity to a ‘virtual’ one — hence, more difficult to identify or control. One example being, the sale of a tiger skin that went unnoticed in 2002 on the website baazee.com, (the skin was touted as the world’s largest, up for $1 million) until a story appeared on a news website.
I did a quick browse to find what was on offer online — rare butterflies, beetles, birds, tortoise, turtles, monkeys, rhino horns and ivory artefacts; the last were found on sale on eBay, some claim to be ‘pre-ban’. But an International Fund for Animal Welfare report in 2007 revealed that at least 90 percent of all investigated ivory listings on eBay were legally suspect.
Internationally, illegal wildlife trade is measured at over $25 billion annually, and the virtual world has just widened the market further. To just get an idea of the size of the market, IFAW found more than 9,000 wild animals or products — from live chimpanzees to ivory tusks — for sale in chat rooms and on legitimate trading sites over a one-week period.
THE VOLUME of trade has an ominous impact on India’s wildlife, for this is primarily a source country, the suppliers in this murky business. The product — be it a tortoise or a monkey or cobra skins — may be auctioned online by a dealer based in, say, China or the US, or any part of the world, but it may well have been sourced from India. Take the recent case of two Czech nationals who were accused of unauthorised collecting of rare and protected insect species from the Singhalila National Park in West Bengal. It is reported that they routinely used the Internet to sell their ‘collection’.
The single-most important factor fuelling the wildlife trade on the Internet is anonymity. Most sellers use fake names and addresses and change their email identities frequently. Communications and deals that begin in open fora later shifts to emails, chatrooms, discussion boards etc., making identifying and tracking of the persons responsible a difficult, if not almost impossible, task.
And with negligible web patrolling, endangered species are under the hammer in the virtual world, for sale to the highest bidder — dead or alive. •
From Tehelka Magazine, Vol 5, Issue 37, Dated Sept 20, 2008

Monday, June 15, 2009

Minister spots the tiger, clears aircraft and sensors for Corbett


Neha Sinha Posted: Tuesday , Jun 16, 2009 at 0413 hrs IST(Indian Express)
CORBETT: Years ago, he went to Periyar tiger reserve in Kerala, Sunderbans tiger reserve in West Bengal and Ranthambhore tiger reserve in Rajasthan, but he couldn’t spot a tiger. Then after taking Independent charge as Minister for Environment and Forests, one of the first official trips Jairam Ramesh made was to the Bhadra tiger reserve in Karnataka to see India’s most famous animal. But the tiger eluded him again. Last Saturday, the Minister got his wish — he saw two tigresses in the Corbett tiger reserve.
So it was appropriate that he cleared an ambitious plan for Corbett in Uttarakhand, on the lines never seen before for tiger conservation. He is now working to get Corbett its very own microlight aircraft for surveillance and monitoring, along with a net of motion sensors. Technology, the Minister says, gives a “psychological edge” over poachers.
“Most of the world’s tigers are here in India,” said Ramesh. “If we need to get ahead of poachers, we need to think out of the box. And whatever innovations we do, we have to start here at Corbett, which is like the Taj Mahal of India’s tiger reserves. This place has most of India’s tigers,” he told The Indian Express.
He has now cleared a Rs 8.5-crore Comprehensive Security Plan for Corbett, which will pan out over the next six years. “This is a big area and mobility is a problem. The microlight aircraft will be used for surveillance and also during times of emergency. We need connectivity and mobility which such an aircraft can bring. Apart from Corbett, we also will bring in this aircraft at the Namdapha tiger reserve in Arunachal Pradesh, which suffers from lack of connectivity,” he said.
The sensors all over the reserve will monitor movement, especially in areas used for illegal entry and exit by poachers. These were part of the security plan for Corbett proposed by the Uttarakhand Forest Department which has been cleared by the Ministry. Corbett, as per the 2007 All India Tiger Estimation, has the maximum tigers in the world — between 160-200 in the 1,000-square-km landscape. Funds are also being moved for a new museum for Corbett in Ramnagar.
On his visit, Ramesh interacted with Van Gujjars, a community traditionally living in the forest, but after a 2006 Amendment to the Wildlife Protection Act now being moved out of the reserve with a compensation package. In the last Budget, then Finance Minister P Chidambaram announced a Rs 50 crore one-time budgetary allocation for a Special Tiger Protection Force (TPF), which would set up a battalion to protect and patrol tiger reserves.
Ramesh is now looking at making a change to include Van Gujjars. A tiger reserve like Corbett is slated to have around 110 men as part of the TPF. “The TPF has been envisaged as a police force but conservation has to be site-specific. Thrusting outsiders or an armed, uniformed force will not always work. Only when local people are given an economic stake in conservation will our policies work. The Van Gujjars I have met are able-bodied, they know the ways of the forest. They should be the first to be part of the TPF.” The Minister has also asked for 181 Van Gujjar families to be moved out of Corbett tiger reserve in the next two months.
Meanwhile, tiger-spotting remains Ramesh’s favourite part. He spotted his first tigers on Saturday atop an elephant in Corbett’s core area — a tigress with her sub-adult cub. “You could say I spotted a tigress and a half. The sub-adult tigress was rather excitable but the mother was very peaceful. This is a great moment.”

Tigress found dead in Nagarhole Tiger Reserve





MYSORE: Close on the heels of the forest department officials seizing tiger skin at Mangala near Gundulpet, a tigress was found dead in Nagarhole national park on Thursday. The carcass of the tigress was examined by veterinarians, who have concluded that the wild cat died due to natural reasons. There are no external marks on the animal either, Nagarhole DCF D Yatish Kumar said. The carcass was noticed by the forest guards on patrol in Antarasanthe range of the tiger reserve. The DCF and ACF visited the spot and inspected the site. The animal is believed to be 12 years old. This is the second case of tiger death reported from Nagarhole-Bandipur tiger reserves in recent times. A month ago, the forest officials seized the skin of a tiger skin, which was suspected to have been poached inside the Bandipur national park.
(Note: From the November 2008 the incidents of tiger deaths and recoveries of tiger carcass started in the major tiger reserves of the country. More than 10 tigers died un-naturally in Kaziranga, 6 in Kanha, 3-4 in Corbett, 2-3 in Ranthambhore, similarly it happend in other tiger reserves also. Most of the deaths were concluded as natural deaths or due to infighting. The post-mortem were done hastily and finally the carcass were burnt in most of the cases, consequently the NTCA has issued a comprehensive guideline for the preliminary examination of the dead tiger by an expert team including a veterinarian and the disposal mechanism of the tiger carcass.
What do these deaths indicate? Has sensitivity to take tiger deaths seriously been drastically gone down in the field? Are the reserves lacking the required 'spirit' of tiger conservation in the present situation ?
Even after some good news relating tiger breeding in Ranthambhore and some other tiger reserves and tiger re-locations excercises in Sariska and Panna, the recent deaths of the tigers and the above raised questions have demoralised the conservationists and all those who really wish to see the tiger alive in our country for generations to come. Still we have time and I do hope for the best.-Ramesh Pandey)

Increase in reptile smuggling worries wildlife officials


New Delhi (PTI): An alarming increase in the smuggling of reptiles such as monitor lizards, snakes and turtles in the Tarai belt of Uttar Pradesh bordering Nepal has prompted the Wildlife Crime Control Bureau to issue an alert.
"We fear that there is possible involvement of an organised nexus of cross-border poachers who are swiftly smuggling the reptiles to the international market via Nepal route where political instability has made their task easier," Ramesh Pandey of WCCB told PTI.
He was of the view that the new emerging pattern in wildlife trade from the region that borders with Nepal as well as the state of Uttarakhand need to be tracked.
"Going by a large number of seizures of turtles, sand boas (snake species) and monitor lizards, it seems the trade appears to be controlled by an organized nexus with the help of locals. We have issued alert in the state to keep the officials on their guard," Mr. Pandey said.
He said since the species are found in non-forest areas as well, quiet often the criminals take advantage of the ignorance of the officers on duty, who are at times oblivious to the changing wildlife crime trends in the international market.
http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/001200906101601.htm (for news attached)

Minister visits NTCA and other wildlife offices

Mr Jairam Ramesh, MoS, MoEF, Government of India visited National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) office at Bikaner House Annexe in the recent past. The Hon. Minister also took a glance of the offices of Central Zoo Authority (CZA) and Wildlife Crime Control Bureau (WCCB), Northern Region.
He discussed with Dr. Rajesh Gopal and the other officials on tiger and wildlife conservation issues. During his visit Dr Rajesh Gopal (IG/MS, NTCA), Dr B R Sharma (MS, CZA), Mr S P Yadav (DIG/JD, NTCA) and Mr Ramesh Pandey (RDD-NR, WCCB) were present.
Youtube video link (NDTV News):http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyFikFkuMQo

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

As Tigers Disappear, Poachers Turn to Leopards in India


Paroma Basu in New Delhi, Indiafor National Geographic News
December 3, 2008
A recent flurry of leopard-skin seizures by Indian wildlife authorities suggests that as tigers decline, poachers are increasingly on the prowl for the country's other big cat. At least 141 leopards have fallen to poaching so far in 2008, compared to 124 leopards killed in 2007. In contrast, 24 tigers were killed so far this year, according to the New Delhi-based nonprofit Wildlife Protection Society of India. About 27 of those skins have been taken in just the past few months. Leopard poaching numbers have fluctuated in the 14 years the wildlife society has worked on the issue, in part due to enforcement activity. Many leopard deaths go undetected, said Tito Joseph, program manager at the society. "The situation is serious," Joseph said.
But the increased number of seizures may be due to improved wildlife enforcement and agency coordination, rather than an actual rise in leopard killings, said Ramesh Pandey, deputy director of the government's new Wildlife Crime Control Bureau. Authorities seize between 150 to 200 leopard skins and bodies from around the country every year—implying a steady market for leopard skins and parts. Even so "there is no doubt that the leopard is under threat," Pandey said.

Cheaper than Tigers :Indian leopard skin and parts largely wind up in China, traveling via Nepal, experts say. The skin serves various decorative purposes, while leopard bones and other parts are most likely masqueraded as tiger products and sold for use in traditional Chinese medicine, said Joseph of the wildlife society.But as India's tiger population has dwindled to just 1,411 individuals—most of them in protected reserves—it is getting more cost-effective for traders to get into the leopard business, experts say.



"There is increased value for leopard shins, claws, bones, and penises because it is getting much harder to catch tigers," said Kartick Satyanarayan, co-founder of Wildlife SOS, a nonprofit animal rescue group in New Delhi that works with the Indian government to nab poachers.
Adaptable Predators: It's also easier to catch leopards because they are more plentiful than tigers. Although there is still no official estimate on leopard populations in India, wildlife advocates guess the population could be anywhere between 10,000 to 20,000. A detailed leopard census will be carried out over the next three years, experts say. Unlike tigers, which prefer to live deep in the jungle, nocturnal and solitary leopards can adapt easily to a variety of landscapes. That includes, increasingly, the fringes of human settlements.
It's this adaptability that has also made leopards vulnerable to run-ins with humans, said Rajesh Gopal, member secretary of the government's National Tiger Conservation Authority, which has been allotted more than U.S. $1 billion over the next five years to protect both big cat species in India.
Farmer Conflicts:While poachers are responsible for supplying at least half of all leopard skins and parts to China, leopards killed by farmers and landowners provide another source.
As leopard habitat shrinks, more of the predators are attacking livestock for food.
Although the government compensates farmers who lose livestock to wildlife, payments usually take so long to arrive that villagers take matters into their own hands. For instance, reports of leopards being poisoned to death are more and more common. In November, a five-year-old leopard was found dead after a suspected poisoning near the town of Gūdalūr, in southern India.
The wildlife society estimates that at least 38 leopards have died in similar situations in India this year, a marked increase from 2000, when about 14 leopards died from human conflicts.
"When leopards become a nuisance, many villagers resort to poisoning them and then selling the bodies off to traders for a pittance," said Gopal of the conservation authority. "These [skins and body parts] then end up in big trading hub centers like Nāgpur [a central Indian city] or New Delhi before crossing the border and going away. All this is no secret."
Solutions:Ensuring the faster delivery of compensation payments to farmers and creating alternative livelihoods for poacher groups would both slow the big cat trade, Gopal said.
But authorities must also agree on changing the way land is used, for example by creating managed buffer zones in which humans and animals could peacefully co-exist. "There are still healthy populations of leopards," Gopal said. "So even if we wake up right now, we can still save all these precious animals from getting extinct."

http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/entertainment/tiger-decline-makes-poachers-increase-leopard-hunting-in-india_100127001.html
Photo Credit: (C) Rahul Dutta, Traffic India, Web Ref: http://www.panda.org/who_we_are/wwf_offices/bhutan/news/?124200

Tuesday, June 2, 2009

Authorities stress on need for cross-border cooperation to fight wildlife trade


Delhi, June 2, 2009: Nepali and Indian wildlife conservation authorities have recommended trans-border cooperation as an urgent requirement to tackle illegal wildlife trade across the porous Indo-Nepal border.
The recommendation was one of the several outcomes of the two-day workshop on ‘wildlife enforcement and law’ organised last week by the Uttar Pradesh Forest Department and IFAW-WTI (International Fund for Animal Welfare – Wildlife Trust of India). The workshop, held at Dudhwa Tiger Reserve in the northern Indian state of Uttar Pradesh, was attended by representatives of the Forest Department, Police and NGOs from India as well as Nepal, and the Indian Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB) responsible for guarding the Indo-Nepal border.
With emphasis on control of cross-border illegal trade across the Indo-Nepal border, the workshop addressed issues like wildlife trade in Dudhwa-Pilibhit areas, wildlife conservation laws of the two countries, ways to apprehend wildlife criminals and successfully fight court cases against them, identification of wildlife materials, CITES and its application and improved intra- as well as international cooperation.
Ramesh Pandey, Deputy Director Northern Region, Wildlife Crime Control Bureau, spoke on the need and ways to stop organised wildlife crime and movement of wandering gangs. “There is a general upward movement in wildlife trade across this region. Wildlife articles, notably those of mammals including large carnivores, elephants, rhinos etc, are smuggled from India to sink countries like China and Southeast Asian countries with Nepal as conduit. Cross border movement of poaching gangs and tribals in the Indo-Nepal border will have to be monitored and investigated systematically to ensure that none of those involved go free,” he said.
Among other recommendations, the authorities of the two countries also concurred on institutionalised information sharing, development of common database of wildlife criminals and increasing awareness of local people on both sides of the border.
Nepal and India share a 1850 km-long international boundary, which is mostly unrestricted. Cross-border wildlife crime and operations of criminals through the Indo-Nepal international border is one of the menacing threats to wildlife in India as well as in Nepal.
“Illegal wildlife traders have easy access to safety with the open international border between India and Nepal, but enforcement officials on both sides of the border are generally helpless due to diplomatic restraints and lack of capacity, leading to wildlife criminals going unhindered on most occasions,” said Ashok Kumar, Vice-chairman, WTI.
“There is an urgent need for coordinated approach between authorities of the two countries to tackle cross border illegal wildlife activities. This was the aim of the worshop… to facilitate coordination and understanding among relevant authorities across the border,” he added.
By: Sheren Shrestha,Wildlife Trust of India,http://www.mediaforfreedom.com/ReadArticle.asp?ArticleID=15847